[105] Good Design Advice That Makes Bad Websites

Some design rules sound so sensible that we stop questioning them. Everything should be above the fold. People don't read websites. Keep everything consistent.

But what happens when following those rules makes a website harder to use?

In episode 105 of Think Inside the Square, we're looking at five common design principles that can lead to some pretty questionable websites when they're applied without context.

Everything doesn't belong above the fold

Your hero section has an important job, but that job isn't to explain the entire business before someone scrolls.

Trying to fit every headline, button, image, and selling point into the first section creates competition for attention.

Scrolling is a normal part of using the internet. A good first section gives people enough context to understand where they are and a reason to keep exploring.

Instead of asking how much information can fit above the fold, ask what someone needs to see to become interested in what's next.

Scannable doesn't mean short

People scan websites. That's true.

But that doesn't mean people never read.

Someone shopping for a pair of socks might only need a few essential details. Someone considering a major financial investment in a service may want much more information.

The context matters.

Good web design makes information easy to scan without removing details people need to make an informed decision. Clear headings, shorter paragraphs, and thoughtful content organization can make even longer pages approachable.

The goal isn't to use fewer words. It's to present useful information effectively.

Consistency isn't repetition

A consistent design system helps people understand and navigate a website.

Typography, color, image style, and tone of voice can create a recognizable identity across different pages.

But consistency doesn't mean every section needs the same layout.

Repeating the same two or three arrangements throughout a website can make the design feel predictable and uninspired.

Different content deserves different presentation. A strong statement might need a section of its own. Related information could work in a grid. An interesting story might deserve an oversized photograph.

Variety and consistency can work together.

Not every section needs a button

Calls to action should be easy to find, but more buttons don't automatically create a better website.

When every section contains a brightly colored button, and the navigation, popup, and floating elements all compete for attention, it becomes harder to understand which action matters.

A useful exercise is to imagine a page with just one prominent call to action.

Which action would you choose? Where would you put it? What would someone need to know before clicking?

That decision should guide the visual hierarchy of the page, even when additional links and buttons are appropriate.

A website doesn't need to be a miniature movie

Animations and custom interactions can make a website memorable.

They can also become exhausting.

When every headline, image, paragraph, and button moves as someone scrolls, the movement can compete with the content itself.

Thoughtful interactions can support a brand and enhance the experience. The distinction is whether they're helping visitors understand and use the website or simply adding another thing to watch.

Not everything needs to move.

Better decisions make better websites

Design principles exist for a reason, but they aren't universal instructions.

The right amount of content, the best layout, the most useful call to action, and the appropriate level of interaction all depend on the project.

Good designers understand the purpose behind the rules and know when a different decision makes more sense.

Next
Next

[104] How to Choose the Right Squarespace Features Before You Design